<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Publicity and Online Marketing Resources &#187; editors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.publicityship.com.au/publicityship-blog/tag/editors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.publicityship.com.au</link>
	<description>Services and resources for small business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Convincing Editors with $ in their Eyes</title>
		<link>http://www.publicityship.com.au/publicityship-blog/convincing-editors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.publicityship.com.au/publicityship-blog/convincing-editors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicityship.com.au/?p=962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no doubt publishers have their own eyes on the main game &#8211; revenue.  David Welford&#8217;s recent comment reflects a thought that inevitably enters your mind when looking to maximise publicity.
If you are newsworthy, your story helps a publisher makes money. If you are an advertiser, your ad makes them money. 
A strong [...]<p>a</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt publishers have their own eyes on the main game &#8211; revenue.  <a href="http://www.publicityship.com.au/publicityship-blog/product-marketing-how-a-micro-business-achieved-local-publicity-worth-thousands/#comments">David Welford&#8217;s</a> recent comment reflects a thought that inevitably enters your mind when looking to maximise publicity.</p>
<p>If you are newsworthy, your story helps a publisher makes money. If you are an advertiser, your ad makes them money. </p>
<p>A strong story will get coverage, if the story isn&#8217;t as strong (or if the editor is spoilt for choice) then maybe a story from one of their advertisers has an edge. </p>
<p>So if you want to maximise your chances of coverage with a particular publication then look at it this way:</p>
<ul>
<li>if your story is very strong &#8211; unique or first of a kind, good human interest, great images &#8211; they pitch it to an editor who will be interested in the story</li>
<li>if your story is likely to be one option of many for an editor, maybe consider becoming an advertiser before pitching your story</li>
</ul>
<p>Becoming an advertiser is a way of getting some attention, if only in a small way, and is quite different to paying for editorial.  But getting an editor&#8217;s attention can be hard at times, so if it helps, why not?  </p>
<p>And who knows, you may even get some value out of the ad.</p>
<p>a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.publicityship.com.au/publicityship-blog/convincing-editors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
